Timing total 2248s
| Intake conversation | 30s |
| Gate 1 (spec review) | 80s |
| Planning | 162s |
| Gate 2 (plan review) | 140s |
| Specialists + checks | 924s |
| Gate 3 (diff review) | 911s |
Token burn total 227,107 (in 201,516 / out 25,591) · est. cost $1.23
orchestrator 193,466
+
specialists 33,641
=
total 227,107
| Phase | Input | Output | Total | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| intake | 1,292 | 386 | 1,678 | 1 |
| architect | 185,106 | 6,682 | 191,788 | 2 |
| specialist:postgres | 15,118 | 18,523 | 33,641 | 2 |
| TOTAL | 201,516 | 25,591 | 227,107 | 5 |
Agent Neo activity — live output from the architect & specialists
loading…
Candidate learnings 6 pending — harvested from specialist reports
Deviations and open questions the specialists flagged. Accepting
appends the note to context/learnings.md, which the
architect reads on future runs. Dismissing drops it. Nothing
enters the agents' context until you accept it.
open_question
specialist:postgres
**Populate `index_changes`?** The plan's intent (4 unique indexes) is clear and the schema supports it, but `index_changes` is `none`, which my rules treat as "ship nothing." Please confirm whether the four indexes above should be ticked into `index_changes` so a specialist can apply them, or whether the empty list was intentional.
open_question
specialist:postgres
**Existing duplicates** — has the duplicate pre-flight been run on prod-like data? If duplicates exist, a backfill/cleanup is needed before the indexes can deploy.
deviation
specialist:postgres
The plan's `index_changes` is `none`; per the reviewer instruction these four unique indexes were nonetheless implemented exactly as described in the plan's `postgres_changes` notes. This deviation is the explicit subject of the revision request.
open_question
specialist:postgres
**Pre-existing duplicates (deploy-time failure risk).** `CREATE UNIQUE INDEX` will FAIL if any project already has two constrained rows sharing a `Name` (live rows only for `Asset` / `CommissioningSystem`). This could not be checked here (no DB access). Before deploying, run per table: ```sql SELECT "ProjectShardId", "Name", COUNT(*) FROM xyz."AssetType" GROUP BY "ProjectShardId", "Name" HAVING COUNT(*) > 1; ``` (analogous for `SystemType`; add `WHERE "IsDeleted" = FALSE` for `Asset` and `CommissioningSystem`). If any rows return, a Patch/ cleanup or manual dedup is required first — do not sil
open_question
specialist:postgres
**"System" → `CommissioningSystem` mapping.** The spec's "System" table maps to `xyz.CommissioningSystem`. Confirm this is the intended table.
open_question
specialist:postgres
**API 409/422 shaping is out of scope.** A duplicate insert/update will now raise a DB unique-violation; the friendly 409/422 response is a separate API2 change not done here.
Error
prs gate rejected by anon
Conversation
Make Name column Unique for these tables:
AssetType, SystemType, Asset, System
AssetType, SystemType, Asset, System
Straightforward uniqueness constraint on the Name column across four tables.
Spec ready — see Gate 1 below.
Chat closed — run has advanced past intake.
Spec
approve
Plan
approve
Validation:
- [error] changeset_author: Database/xyz/Constraints/999_indexes.sql: changeset author is 'davewebb' but must be 'agentneo'. Use `--changeset agentneo:<id> …`. @ Database/xyz/Constraints/999_indexes.sql
Specialist bundles reject
postgres
at storage/clones/37325fc56f80/postgres
added: 0
modified: 1
deleted: 0
Modified files
Pipeline artifacts
Generated for review — not included in any PR or pushed to the repo.